Fascinated_foreigner Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is evidence--from the gospels, at
> least--that the event was investigated and the
> laws of nature thoroughly considered. The tomb was
> searched and found to be empty. If the
> resurrection was merely a spiritual phenomenon,
> the body would not have been affected. But, the
> testimony of the gospels clearly makes the point
> that the body was not in the grave. In the famous
> 'Doubting Thomas' story, Thomas started out just
> like you: as a first-class sciencist. He demanded
> to be able to stick his finger in the hole in
> Jesus' hand and his hand in Jesus' side. You're
> acting as if there was no investigation of the
> claims that Jesus rose from the grave took place.
>
>
> hey do any of you guys what me to post a rebuttal
> to this CSI JERUSALEM episode. I know pb doesn't
> want me to but should I bother. Are you guys gonna
> read it? The rebuttal is a standard one you
> probably could find with a bit a research. It's
> standard because. like the creationist. the
> "evidence of the Resurrection" mob bring out the
> same one tired argument over and over again,
> arguments that have been torn to shreds over and
> over again. yet like creationists, they dust
> themselves off and pitch the same argument again.
> So should I bother....
So long as you can avoid piggishness, which you often fall prey to, I'll look forward to reading it.
If it quacks like a duck it's a duck. If it oinks like a pig it's a pig. Can you not be a pig? That's the question.