Mystery solved.

I think you heard the word "astronaut" and your imagination got the better of you.

Again.

You think wrong. Again.

You thought wrong again.

Well, not sure which is more grammatically correct. But "You think wrong," is generally applicable to you.

BTW, how are you liking your new Believer teammate? I think Gonzo fits right in with you, Ponderer and PTTP.

Not surprising that you're not sure... again.

Not surprising that your last three posts have said absolutely nothing and made absolutely zero sense. There always comes a point where you completely stop talking about the topic and go into ego-preservation mode. It makes the rest of us feel bad for you, but hey, we can't do much about it.

Now if you got anything else about UFO's, be my guest. I especially like reading my old posts after you go through the work of dredging them up, so feel free to go running back to the search engine. "People hear the word "astronaut" and their imaginations get the better of them." It's just soooooo true!

Dude, that astronaut line was so preposterous it was seared into my memory banks. Made it that much easier to find it - well worth 5 seconds of search time for the opportunity to expose you to the board.

Again.

"... well worth 5 seconds of search time ..."

Yeah, five "seconds," we get it, Indy. You slipped up and now everyone knows you're desperate to trip me up. Good god, Indy, that post was from years ago. And now comes the obligatory backpedaling. "It was only five seconds, guys, I swear!"

<snicker>

Why don't you go spend another "5 seconds" sifting through my posts and find something that you can actually prove I was wrong about.

Not "Indy prove," mind you. Actually prove.

Ummm... Navy? The search function goes back years if/when necessary - and in just a matter of seconds too.

Just fyi.

"The search function goes back years ..."

... and you still haven't found anything to get me on, little buddy? Alright, well I'll just get comfortable while you keeeeep pluggin' away.

You don't want me to start looking, Navy. We both know that.

Yeah like when I pointed out the incident with the Japanese airline with the pilot and crew that saw a huge UFO following them over Alaska. He said it was chaff. If they are willing to go to any extreme to pooh pooh a sighting away then short of shaking ET's hand. You will not convince him. Look if a person takes the time to look at the evidence that the probability of them being here is high. Then look at the actual evidence, the credible witnesses, the various trace evidence and radar and other detection devices. They just will not be convinced without shaking hands. I for one like the Canadian one where it went into the water and the townsfolk called in their coast guard.

Man the older I get the worst my writing and spelling gets. Sorry
P.S. This was supposed to be a response to a comment earlier. I don't know why it posted it at the end under everyone's comments. I thought it would post under the comment I was responding to. OH Well.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/27/2015 06:45PM by latch33534.

Dick needs to see it reported on CNN to believe it. Seriously - that was his benchmark for "proof" when I asked.

Latch, in the Wikipedia entry for Extraterrestrial Life I found this:

Many scientists consider extraterrestrial life plausible, but there is no direct evidence of its existence.

Do you believe this statement is erroneous?

I would say it's not necessarily erroneous - but it's also not the final word for more than one reason.