By oldedude January 17, 2024 7:28 pm Category: President (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post Write A New Article How To Post Here Rate this article (5=best, 0=poor)

This is showing the GOP has the balls to impeach pedojoe on several fronts. 14 dems actually vote AGAINST curt's chosen one. And curt's ideals. curt "said" this is what "he wanted," (people who knowingly come in to the US).

The House on Wednesday approved a resolution condemning the Biden administration’s border and immigration policies, a move by GOP lawmakers to maintain pressure on the politically polarizing issue in the weeks ahead.

The legislation pins singular blame on President Biden’s “open-border policies” for conditions at the U.S.-Mexico border, highlighting the stark partisanship behind immigration and border policy. It passed 225-187, with 14 Democrats voting in favor.

The vote is the latest example of Republicans running a full-court press on the matters of immigration and border security in the new year, which have proved to be salient issues among voters. It also allows them to message on a topic that has been a weak spot for the Biden administration.

My view? they're testing the waters for full illegally..... (meaning we're testing the political waters for a full injunction and impeachment.

Cited and related links:

1. msn.com

Comments Start Below

by oldedude on January 17, 2024 7:38 pm So they had 14 dims jump party lines to talk shit about pedojoe's lovechild at the border. the dims are breaking apart about pedojoe. by HatetheSwamp on January 18, 2024 4:11 am Lots of juicy implications, OD. One thing I wonder is if we're beginning to see is that Hakeem Jeffries ain't the effective Dem House leader that Nancy was. I'm doubting 14 Dems would have bolted with Nancy in charge. And, you're right. Considering the way Mike Johnson has handled the Hunter and Impeachment Inquiry brouhaha, this may work its way into Impeachment. by oldedude on January 18, 2024 5:02 am I was thinking along those lines also. This was such an open (but minor) revolt against the "party's leadership." Especially for the little germans to throw out there. With all the issues with pedojoe, and even the moderates are hoping he doesn't run. The only ones that are openly supporting him are the folks in lockstep with him and aren't willing to negotiate on anything. And I agree with little nancy being the ringleader. NO ONE would have stepped out of line. And to have more than two or three border reps jumping ship is very telling. I think this might be testing the waters for impeachment down the road. Oh the "I'm sorry" part was that I figured you'd be writing a thread on this as I was. I didn't want to walk on you. by HatetheSwamp on January 18, 2024 5:58 am I often mention what purple district GOPs do realizing that the next election is always right around the corner. Another way to look at this is that HouseDems are beginning to get very, very nervous about this election. If you support Joe on immigration my guess is that you're in trouble... unless you're in a crimson red district. Despite Dem arguments that Bidenomics rocks, clearly people don't agree. by oldedude on January 18, 2024 11:57 am Here are the dems that voted for it. All were swing districts. Three were from TX. Caraveo (CO) is a dyed in the wool liberal sponsored a bill giving free contraceptives and reproductive care to illegal immigrants (I can live with that). Worked on obomber's campaign and is the daughter of illegals that were nationalized in 1986. Allred Texas Caraveo Colorado Craig Minnesota Cuellar Texas Davis (NC) North Carolina Golden (ME) Maine Gonzalez, Vicente Texas Landsman Ohio Lee (NV) Nevada Moskowitz Florida Nickel North Carolina Peltola Alaska Perez Washington Sorensen Illinois by Curt_Anderson on January 18, 2024 12:27 pm Is there anything that has less effect and importance than a governmental body's "resolution"? Here are some recent headlines: Iowa House passes pro-Israel resolution as protesters shout 'shame' Ann Arbor School Board OK's a Resolution Supporting a Cease-Fire in Gaza by HatetheSwamp on January 18, 2024 12:47 pm What strikes me as significant is that this wouldn't have happened when Nancy was in charge. When Nancy was in charge, GOPs stepped across the aisle from.time to time... but the Dems walked in lockstep. Now?... The fact that 14 Dems joined with GOPs to denounce the Flatulent Fool is merely symbolic...but that some Dems have taken this first baby step probably don't mean nuthin. I'm beginning to think that Mike Johnson is a far stronger leader than anyone else in DC, with the possible exception of John Roberts in the Supreme Court. And, if Johnson can keep that small cell of HouseGOP anarchists from destroying his Speakership, he may turn out to be a leader of historic significance. I am perplexed what this small step toward bipartisanship means to a Good German such as yourself, Curt. You're such a partisan purist. Even this must hurt. by oldedude on January 18, 2024 12:47 pm It makes a statement. To answer your question for Ann Arbor, that's all it does. In the case of the border, it "denounced" a policy. Again, a statement. And there's a shot across the bow that the dims are needing to look at. Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page