Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Legitimate polling after the verdict is not looking good for Trump
Fact Check by Curt_Anderson     June 1, 2024 2:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [15 views]


Musical interlude
Music by Indy!     May 31, 2024 9:34 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (4 comments) [75 views]


Okay. So let me get this straight... The trial was a TRAVESTY?
Crime by Ponderer     May 31, 2024 2:45 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (11 comments) [110 views]


Norm McDonald
Comics by Indy!     May 31, 2024 8:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [10 views]


CRAZED MAGA MOB RIOTS BURNS DOWN MANHATTAN POLICE STATION
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 9:02 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [45 views]


So... How do you think it all went?
Crime by Ponderer     May 30, 2024 5:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (11 comments) [106 views]


Daily Mail Poll: Trump Support Rises After Guilty Verdict
Media by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 1:10 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [20 views]


Joe Manchin leaves the Democratic Party, files as independent
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 11:05 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [28 views]


Remember how much progressives loved Joe's State of the Union speech? His 538 approval in lower than before
President by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 7:27 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [32 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (89 comments) [2712 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Court Denies Trump’s Presidential Immunity Appeal In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case
By Curt_Anderson
December 13, 2023 12:11 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

(Forbes)A federal appeals court rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim he was protected from liability in a defamation lawsuit from writer E. Jean Carroll—who accused Trump of rape—because of presidential immunity, the latest legal blow to the former president and 2024 hopeful.


Cited and related links:

  1. forbes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Court Denies Trump’s Presidential Immunity Appeal In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 12:15 pm

    Has she figured out yet in what year the rape took place? Baha


  2. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 12:29 pm
    She has it down to within a few months, basically wintertime. She stated that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996 in the Bergdorf Goodman department store in New York City.

    Trump isn't attempting the defend his defamatory remarks with any sort of affirmative defense. He argued unsuccessfully that presidential immunity protects him from lawsuits.


    en.wikipedia.org


  3. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 12:41 pm

    So, Trump has no way of proving he was in another place at the time she claims she was raped.


  4. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 12:58 pm
    HtS,
    So unless every altar boy and choir member can nail down the exact time and date of their rape, you'd let every pedophile priest go free?




  5. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 1:02 pm

    Oy, no.

    I've said, from the beginning, that her case is extremely weak. And, if it had not been made in New York, ol E. Jean would have had great difficulty in getting a judgment.

    I'm right.


  6. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 1:38 pm
    HtS,
    Trump could have presented evidence that he was out of town during some or all of the period he allegedly raped her. He didn’t. That she couldn’t nail down the date is point in favor of the defense.

    That other women testified Trump assaulted them helped the plaintiff’s case. That Trump said Carroll is “not his type” then mistook her for his ex-wife helped the plaintiff.

    To win a civil case, a plaintiff must convince the jury by “a preponderance of the evidence.” Simply said, a plaintiff must prove that there is a greater likelihood than not that the defendant did something wrong.

    Do you really think it is unlikely that the pussy grabber forced himself on her?


  7. by oldedude on December 13, 2023 6:52 pm
    HtS,
    Trump could have presented evidence that he was out of town during some or all of the period he allegedly raped her.

    How was he supposed to do that without a timeline? That doesn't make sense. If I don't have a year (even in my boring life) I could have been in Germany, Panama, Costa Rica, Guatamala, Nepal, India, Thailand, Japan, ROK, Saudi, Kuwait, UAE, Somewhere undisclosed in either the Pacific, Atlantic, or Indian Ocean, Qatar, Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iraq, Afghanistan, or Oman. and those aren't even the places I went on leave. That's another, say dozen, dozen and a half countries? And I'm not trumpster with my own jet.


  8. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 9:18 pm
    OD,
    The case wasn't a rape case; it was a defamation case. As with any case, it is the jury's job to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses. Trump did not impress them as being very credible.

    Trump denied that he had ever met Carroll, accused her of "totally lying" and that "she's not my type."

    Here is where Trump shoots himself in the foot: Trump was shown this photograph, he mistakenly identified E. Jean Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples, despite his first wife Ivana Trump also being in the picture; upon recognizing his mistake, he protested that the photo was "very blurry" (the photo is not blurry).


  9. by HatetheSwamp on December 14, 2023 4:45 am

    Exactly, OD. And, I have noted repeatedly, Alan Dershowitz is confident that, for all practical purposes, this will be set aside.

    The TrumpHate theory was that these civil judgments would hurt Trump with moderate and independent voters. Curiously, it seems to have helped.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Court Denies Trump’s Presidential Immunity Appeal In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page